← Back to leaderboard
aryanxmahajan

Aryan Mahajan

Verifieddormant
@aryanxmahajan

AI Infrastructure for Fortune 500s | https://t.co/83DbA8bVII

RosterAI Agents & Productivity ToolsAI Content Creation & Video Gen
21,523 followers · 135 following · Last polled 1h ago
Perf. Score
43.4
Rank #283
Value Score
32.1
#188 of 273 priced
Median views
1.3K
p25 1.1K · trailing 7d
Followers
22K
+0.1% 7d
ER (impr.)
2.67%
eng ÷ impressions
ER (foll.)
0.20%
eng ÷ followers
Est. CPM
$76.39
QT-rate basis
WoW views
-39.5%
▼ falling

Rates & value · est. from 1.3K median organic views

overpriced
Quote tweetbasis
$100
$76.39 / 1K views
Post
—
no CPM
Thread
—
no CPM
Retweet
—
no CPM
Value Score 32.1 · rank #188 of 273 priced$3846.15 / 1K engagementsrate age unknown (pre-audit import)

Trends

Follower growth
Median views / day
Engagement rate
View distribution · trailing-7d posts

Each blue dot is one organic post. The Performance Score ranks by the median (1.3K), not the mean (1.6K) — so a single viral post doesn't inflate a creator's reach. The p25 floor (1.1K) is the level 75% of posts clear.

Recent posts · ranked by views

PostPostedViewsLikesRepostsRepliesQuotesBookmarksER
You can now find AI SEO clients with Claude. I packaged our $15,000 system into a free download. Google page 1. Missing from ChatGPT. Your next AI SEO client could be sitting in that gap. Here's how the system works: → Query engine: generates hiring questions by service and city. → Search audit: compares Google with ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overview and AI Mode. → Gap finder: flags page-1 firms missing from 2+ AI answers while a rival gets recommended. → Owner match: cross-checks decision-makers on Google and LinkedIn. → Pitch writer: drafts 3 messages quoting their exact Google rank and the named rival. Our run: 48 buyer questions. 237 Google/AI responses. Your pitch becomes: "You're #8 on Google for [search], but ChatGPT recommends [competitor]." A specific gap the owner can check themselves. Inside: 10 Claude Code skills, the 6-step browser walkthrough, prompts and Excel workbook. Want the complete AI SDR System? Like + reply "FLOW" + repost, and I'll DM it to you. (must be following)7d ago8.8K1946218012387.68%
I used AI to build 115,000 followers and a 7-figure business. 50M+ views. 70,000+ inbound leads. LinkedIn. Instagram. X. YouTube. Just 1 raw idea in → 4 platform drafts and a production plan out. → No more 200-view posts that sound like every other founder → No more $5,000/month ghostwriters who still don't sound like you → No more guessing what to post on 4 different platforms Getting Claude to write a post is easy. Getting content worth publishing, week after week, takes more than "make it sound like me." Here's how it works: → Research (your sources → useful facts, audience questions, and concrete examples) → Idea selection (up to 5 angles → the strongest point, with weaker ones rejected) → Native writing (1 angle → LinkedIn post, X post, Reel talking points, YouTube outline) → Editing (draft + writing samples → sharper openings and copy that sounds like you) → Production planning (drafts → what to publish first, what to record, what to defer) → Performance review (actual results → what to repeat, change, and test next) The research shapes the writing. The results shape your next round of ideas. Change the business, buyer, and voice files, and reuse the same process for another brand or client. I packaged it into a free interactive walkthrough, 4-file starter, and complete 28-file workspace, with platform instructions and a worked example. Runs in Claude or ChatGPT. No code. Want the complete AI Marketing OS? Like + reply "OS" + repost, and I'll DM it to you. (must be following)
10d ago
6.8K
156
62
136
0
157
7.51%
If your team gives the same pitch 500 times a year, then this could be the tool that helps them close more deals. Memorizing the script is easy. The awkward buyer is what reps need to practice against. Synthesia Sessions lets them: - Rehearse hard conversations with live feedback - Ask follow-ups in customer interviews A manager cannot coach 1,000 reps a week. An avatar can.frozen20d ago6.6K43010321.16%
Why is everyone with "building in public" in their bio completely broke? Because 99% of people calling themselves "AI founders" are playing startup instead of running a business. Locking themselves in a bedroom for 6 months. Write code, stress over Stripe webhooks, debug auth flows, and fight to get approved on the App Store. All to launch a $49 a month SaaS tool to an audience of 0. Building for ghosts. Do the math on that business model: To make $5,000 a month, you need 100 paying customers at $49 a month with zero churn. Every single month you are fighting tooth and nail just to replace the people who cancelled. Meanwhile, look at how the real world operates. I was sitting with 2 business owners in LA last week. They run a portfolio doing $15M to $20M a year. Real companies. Real payroll. Their current internal "AI strategy"? An intern using ChatGPT to draft reel scripts, and executives using it to rewrite emails. They know they are falling behind. They know their operations are bleeding time. And they would cut a $5,000 to $10,000 check tomorrow to anyone who walks in, maps their actual bottlenecks, and automates their workflows. A $5,000 check does not even require an executive sign-off for them. It is pocket change. Stop playing SF startup founder for an empty room. The playbook is simple: 1. Pick ONE client acquisition channel. 2. Build a working demo of a workflow that solves a real business bottleneck. 3. Show it to owners of businesses doing $5M to $20M. 4. Close the build and collect cash. The market does not need another $49 wrapper. It needs people who can actually IMPLEMENT.frozen7d ago3.8K523305413.49%
One AI post made my company $45,000 in revenue. It got 9,000 comments and brought in 53,000 LinkedIn followers. This system runs your voice through 4 frontier models, 3 specialized agents, and an automated slop filter → No more generic AI slop using words like "delve" or "game changer" → No more $5,000/mo ghostwriters taking 3 months to learn your voice → No more 20 hours a week staring at a blank screen Just your voice in → high-converting content out. Here is how the infrastructure works: → Voice Extraction Engine (analyzes your best posts so every draft sounds 100% human) → 3 Specialized Writing Agents (dedicated models for lead magnets, storytelling, and thought leadership) → Anti-Slop Filter (strips generic AI phrases, buzzwords, and repetitive cadence) → Post-to-Pipeline Loop (the exact workflow behind one post that did 9,000 comments and $45,000 in revenue) Every other AI setup only does one half: your tone, OR market research. This loads both before it writes a single word. Packaged the full internal system: 11 skills, prompt files, worked examples, and the 5-minute install guide. Want the complete AI ghostwriter? Like + reply "GHOST" + repost, and I'll DM it to you. (must be following)9d ago2.7K8227771528.88%
single-player AI is cool until you realize actual work happens in chaotic group chats a personal bot trapped in your DMs can’t tell you what the team decided 3 hours ago if the agent isn’t sitting directly in the chat holding context, someone's still scrolling 400 messagesfrozen23d ago2.6K22100211.68%
I charge business owners $15,000 to spend 3 afternoons at my house in LA. Last week’s client was paid $167,000 on a single deal last month. Yet when we audited his calendar, 80% of his entire week was eaten alive by manual data entry across four county websites. Here is the exact economic teardown, the 3-tool stack we installed on his laptop, and why duplicating the founder into AI beat hiring three full-time employees: The unit economics: - Average recovery per closed claim: $120,000 - Gross fee: 35% ($42,000 net per deal) - Current velocity: 1 closed deal / month (~$500k/year) - Target velocity: 3 closed deals / month (~$1.5M/year) The problem was not lead flow. Across California counties alone, over $21,000,000 in unclaimed money was sitting on public lists with 90-day filing deadlines. He was bottlenecked inside his own skull. Every single lead requires deep detective work: → Reviewing deeds → Checking probate records → Tracing family trees through obituaries → Finding a verified phone number that actually rings He couldn't hire a virtual assistant or a junior researcher. Knowing whether an heir’s claim is legally clean requires 10 years of embedded pattern recognition. A junior hire doesn't know when a deed looks forged or when a probate filing is a dead end. The founder trap: His judgment prints $42,000 on a single deal, but he spends 35 hours a week doing $20/hour manual search because he can't duplicate himself. Most founders with this problem get sold a lie: 1. Pay an agency a $10,000 retainer to build a fragile 50-step Make/n8n web 2. The moment an API updates, the automation breaks 3. The founder has no idea how to fix it Or they pay for Copilot or custom GPTs, only to realize an AI trapped in a browser tab with no machine access has complete amnesia. We didn't build cloud webhooks. We built a local operating system directly on his MacBook. The entire stack is three tools: 1. Local Codex Environment → Running directly on his machine with tool execution. It has local access to his files, client folders, and spreadsheets. 2. Wispr Flow → Voice-to-agent interface. Founders in their 30s and 40s freeze when staring at an empty prompt box. With Wispr Flow, he just holds a shortcut and speaks to the system like a senior operator. 3. Airtable → The structured data warehouse. County surplus CSVs get parsed, scored, and mapped into actionable claim rows automatically. He came over with his wife on Thursday. Before that afternoon, his entire experience with AI was typing random questions into the ChatGPT phone app. The first hour was friction. Passwords, terminal installs, permissions. 22 minutes in, he looked up and said: "There's a lot of information." Then we did the boring foundation properly: - Exported 18 months of historical ChatGPT conversations to capture his reasoning models - Cleaned up his local directories and connected Airtable - Documented his research steps the exact way he would train an elite apprentice Then the room flipped. He held up a physical commission check to his camera. The system extracted the line items, calculated the fee splits between him, his partner, and his attorney, and gave him the exact net payout down to the penny. He stared at the screen: "That's to the cent what I got paid." Within an hour, he stopped typing prompts entirely. He was using Wispr Flow to dictate complex background investigation jobs that used to take him four hours an afternoon. Before he and his wife walked out my front door, he looked at her and said: "You don't have to hire anyone. It's crazy." The 3-session framework we run: Session 1: Context Ingestion & Local Architecture → Scrape historical chat logs and past closed deals to map the founder's mental model → Clean local file architecture so agents don't hallucinate on desktop clutter → Set up local terminal execution and Wispr Flow for voice-directed work Session 2: Benchmark Against Closed Deals → Codify evaluation heuristics on what makes a lead viable → Run the system against 10 deals the founder already closed in the past → Benchmark the AI’s research output against reality until hallucination hits 0% Session 3: Pipeline & Action Layer → Connect Airtable to automatically ingest raw county auction lists → Set up background research so leads get enriched while the founder sleeps → Wire outreach drafts so messages and follow-ups wait in a queue for review In a specialized business, one good deal pays six figures. Freeing up 30 hours a week from manual research is worth millions to the bottom line. If you run a $1M to $5M company, your domain knowledge isn't intuition. It is instructions waiting to be codified. You don't need to hire a massive team, and you don't need to wait for software companies to build magical tools for your niche. Stop buying software. Clone your own brain.frozen13d ago2.5K18030251.87%
AI is the most dangerous yes-man in your company if you bring it a flawed business idea, it will not push back. it will cheerfully write you a 10-page plan explaining why you are right before we spend a dollar building any plan, I force a second AI to tear it apart here is the exact handoff: 1/ work through the strategy with Claude (I prefer Opus 5.5). GPT models tend to rush straight into execution. opus is much more patient and analytical, which is what you want when stress-testing a premise. give it the numbers, client messages, and what already failed 2/ once there is a plan, copy the entire chat. paste it cold into Codex or ChatGPT 3/ give it this exact prompt: "Do not build anything yet. Where is the logic weak? Audit my assumptions too, not just the AI's plan." 4/ paste that teardown back into Claude and make it answer every objection why this works: the first model spent 20 messages trying to please you the second model has 0 conversational bias. It has nothing to protect auditing the decision cold costs you two minutes defending a bad plan with your bank account can cost you monthsfrozen8d ago2.3K27081403.24%
made $20k in the last 3 days and still don't know what the fuck Jev is claude and codex still work. clients still pay apparently I'm falling behind should probably learn from the guy with 187 agents running a company that doesn't existfrozen10d ago2.2K39080112.70%
A $10K frontend project could soon start with a single ChatGPT prompt. Imagine needing a pricing calculator for your SaaS. Instead of hiring a developer to build the UI, you describe what you want and ChatGPT generates working sliders, calculations and an interactive interface. OpenAI's new Intelligent UI makes this possible for simple tools. What caught my attention is that these aren't just AI-generated mockups. You can actually interact with them, change inputs and see the results update instantly. Someone even broke down how OpenAI is pulling this off behind the scenes. Pretty crazy how fast we're going from asking AI to write code to having it build things we can actually use.frozen12d ago1.8K20040172.33%
When you make money young, grown adults will treat you like an ATM Last month a guy I haven't spoken to in 2 years asked me for $100,000 0 shame Grown men asking a 23 year old to fund their rent, their tuition, their new business idea Here is the embarrassing part: I've burnt $50,000 of my cash enabling this because I was too weak to have an uncomfortable conversation Sending money felt easier than looking someone in the eye & saying NO Never make excuses, pretend you are having a rough patch or give a 5 minute explanation You owe nobody nothing My money is for my family and the people building with me every single day Now I just say nofrozen9d ago1.7K2206061.97%
was in a room with 7 guys worth $100m to $1b the other night half the age of most of them one built a global brand customizing bugattis, ferraris and rolls-royces a friend asked me after: "bro weren't you intimidated?" nah i was sitting there with a cigar thinking: "there we go again aryan, you outdid yourself this time" if business comes out of it cool, if not whatever meanwhile i've watched grown men turn into complete bobbleheads in rooms like that 5 minutes earlier they're funny and opinionated, then they sit next to money and suddenly agree with everything, laugh at every bad joke and wait for a gap to casually drop their biggest achievement they're so busy watching themselves from the other side of the table that they aren't even in the room same thing on sales calls, talking fast, over-explaining, dropping the price before anyone even objects you think it looks like competence it looks like you need them, and the second they smell that, your leverage is gone you can respect what someone built without needing them to like you and no you won't learn that reading 48 laws of power for the 4th time you learn it from enough days where you had no clue what you were doing and figured it out anyway you carry that with you, whoever you're sitting across from people can tell when you're actually enjoying their company instead of trying to get something out of them i think that's a big part of why i keep getting invited back best believe i'll be doing business with a few of them eventuallyfrozen6d ago1.6K1612161.65%
The reason you have 0 paying AI clients has nothing to do with saturation. You'd rather start over on a new channel than get ignored on this one. A guy on Reddit posted that 3 months of outreach made him $0. He broke down his 150 pitches: • 100 WhatsApp messages to dental clinics • 25 emails to dentists in the UK • 20 LinkedIn connection requests • 8 cold calls • 2 sales partnerships • 1 pitch to the guy at the shawarma counter The shawarma counter is honestly the most committed thing on this list. Then he asked if dental was the wrong niche. But do the math. 150 pitches in 3 months is less than 2 a day, spread across 6 channels. The niche was never the problem. He never stayed anywhere long enough to find out if any of it worked. Before you laugh, you've probably done the exact same thing. A week on Upwork, no replies. "Upwork is dead." Then a Reel convinces you cold email is the secret. A week of that, no meetings. Now you're rewriting your LinkedIn bio at 1 AM. The next channel always looks shinier because nobody has ignored you there yet. And because someone online just told you it's where all their clients come from. So you compare your worst week to their highlight reel, and switch. Switching gives you the excitement back. New plan, new tools, fresh dopamine. You get to feel productive without ever fixing what broke last time. And when it fails, you get to blame the platform instead of your pitch. Here's the part most people miss: outputs always lag inputs. Your first weeks on any channel don't produce revenue. They produce feedback. Who opens. Who replies. Which line kills the conversation. Which offer gets you on a call. That feedback is the groundwork. The money comes from using it. Switching is digging for water, stopping at 3 feet and starting a new hole somewhere else. 6 shallow holes later, you decide there's no water. There was water under every one of them. Clients exist on every channel. Every person you look up to figured out ONE and rode it until it paid. Not six. One. I picked Upwork. 53 of my first 73 proposals got no answer. 20 wrote back. 7 hired me. If I were starting at $0 today, here's exactly what I'd do: 1. Pick one channel where your buyers already are. It matters less which one. It matters that you stay. 2. Set a daily number. On Upwork, that's 7 proposals a day, minimum. "I'll try Upwork" isn't a plan. 3. Hit the number every day, especially the days nobody replies. 4. Write down every send: who opened, who replied, who booked a call, who paid. 5. Once a week, fix the one place people drop off. 6. Give it longer than you planned before you're allowed an opinion on whether it "works." The man who chases two rabbits catches neither. Pick ONE channel and go all in.frozen5d ago1.5K20140182.80%
New cigar lounge is sick https://t.co/EqsRzjVEvpfrozen8d ago1.4K2301011.74%
I'm hiring a Content Director & Lead Shooter in Los Angeles. It's a full-time role starting at $6,000/month. You'd be working directly with me. What you'd be doing: → Following my real day: meetings, deals, drives around LA, other creators → Building each video around a hook before you hit record → Directing me on camera so the footage feels natural and has energy → Shooting YouTube videos, Reels, TikToks, and photos → Handing the editor your best moments and the angle for each video What I'm looking for: → Published work you personally directed and shot for a creator or founder → You know what's working on Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube right now → You're sharp with hooks and know what makes someone stop scrolling → You're plugged into current culture. I'll take that over 20 years in Hollywood → You can find a story in a normal day without me calling every shot → You know what stays off camera: private calls, business details → You live in LA or close by and can film in person most weeks There's a path to $12,000/month as responsibility and results grow. I'm moving fast on this and actively interviewing. If you know someone who'd be a great fit, I'd really appreciate a referral. Feel free to send this to them.frozen24d ago1.4K1309041.83%
a single $200 Claude subscription makes me upwards of $30,000 in client pipeline most people think the roi of ai is saving $500 on a freelance editor saving $2,000 a month on contractors is nice. the real money is never managing them again with freelancers, half my week went to being mr. qa: - writing a brief for every video - recording looms explaining what to fix - waiting 3 days for a rough cut - finding 12 client emails they forgot to blur - asking for italics on one line and getting italics on every slide - explaining why my thumbnail doesn't need a sci-fi server rack behind it by the time a video shipped, i was drained. output capped at 2 to 3 pieces a month now my system already knows my exact taste: - my visuals (black, white, one red accent, real logos only) - my audio (-16 lufs, a little room tone left in so it never sounds fake) - my editing (a repeat for emphasis stays, a stumble goes) - my privacy rules (a client name, email or tab never shows on screen) - my writing (only posts that actually converted, hype buzzwords banned) - one line in my brand file that literally says "no circles, ever" i went from 2 videos a month to full course modules, lead magnets and breakdowns every week 9 lessons recorded in one day a lead magnet built and live in one afternoon, 264 bookmarks in 12 hours the people who pay me are watching that's the $30,000frozen7d ago1.4K1802082.02%
Just moved into a $5M house in Los Angeles Figured that deserved a fun house tour https://t.co/HcxcEq2pNrfrozen10d ago1.4K1402041.45%
you have to be a millionaire in the head before you actually are one long before your bank account reflects it, your spirit has to own it you will never outperform your self-image aura is not walking into a room trying to show people you belong it is walking in completely unbothered because you already decided you do an older friend told me to stop saying i was chasing the life i wanted his explanation: the universe is dumb like ai tell it you're chasing something and it'll keep you chasing tell it who you are and it'll get to work when you believe to your core that you belong, you can sit across from someone far richer than you, respect what they've built and still speak to them as an equal you're curious about how they did it, already thinking about how you'll do it and if everything falls apart tomorrow, you trust yourself to figure it out again that belief changes the risks you take, what you're willing to tolerate and whether you say what you actually think or whatever you think will get you accepted people feel that before they know anything about you i'm extremely intentional about how i speak to myself, and why i keep putting myself in situations where i have to back that belief up everything i do isn't to prove anything to the world i'm proving to myself that i can achieve any goal i set the world can recognize it afterwardsfrozen9d ago1.3K26140133.38%
The most useless question in AI right now: "What’s your tech stack?" Everyone has the exact same $20 subscriptions sitting on their desktop. People ask because if the secret is just a tool, you can buy it tonight and feel like you're one subscription away from the same result. Hand someone a $15,000 ARRI cinema camera with a 50mm Zeiss lens. Do they make Dune? No. They shoot shaky home footage in 4K. The camera captures light. The operator chooses what’s worth pointing it at. Claude, Codex, ChatGPT, Perplexity—none of these models know what happened in your business last week just because you put in a credit card. The leverage isn't the model. It's the context you feed it: - Unfiltered client history in Slack and WhatsApp - Actual internal operating rules - Past mistakes you can't afford to repeat That’s how you can ask about revenue, margins, or deal pipeline and get an accurate answer in 10 seconds without touching a spreadsheet. Answering questions is the easy part. Judgment is where everyone gets burned. Say Claude drafts a sales proposal based on your last call. Should you send it? What did the buyer object to three conversations ago? Which stakeholder still hasn't weighed in? What did your sales lead promise them off-the-record? Without that history, AI will draft a flawless proposal at completely the wrong moment. The model doesn't know where your operation is leaking cash. The prompt doesn't know how your CFO approves an invoice. Stop obsessing over the tools. The moat has always been the context.frozen29d ago1.1K1102051.59%
AI isn't replacing creative teams in the future. It already replaced our entire production studio. Here is the exact system we use to turn messy 30-minute raw recordings into finished course lessons, IG reels and lead magnets with 0 human editors. The 4 contractor roles replaced by code: 1. The sound engineer Used to pay: $300 to $500/mo for someone to fight room echo and laptop fan hum Now: Auphonic API Kills desk rumble, strips room reflection, balances quiet lines against loud ones, and hits broadcast loudness (-16 LUFS) in 60 seconds. Pennies per video. 2. The privacy blur guy Used to pay: $25/hr for an assistant to watch 30-minute client walkthroughs at normal speed and manually drag blur boxes over emails and Slack tabs Now: Claude reading every frame + ffmpeg Finds every client name, email address and meeting window, blurs each one frame-exactly, then rescans the export to verify nothing leaked. Zero manual keyframing. 3. The video editor Used to pay: $75 to $100 a video on Upwork to trim stumbles, because Loom's trim tool is too blunt and chops off words Now: Claude cutting straight from the transcript Scans word timestamps, finds every false start and every pause over 1.2 seconds, and executes 40 to 50 frame-accurate cuts. A rambling 26-minute take becomes a tight 21-minute lesson in seconds. 4. The graphic designer Used to pay: $40 per graphic, waiting 48 hours for revisions that still used the wrong fonts Now: Claude Code + Brandfetch API + saved templates Pulls the lesson topic, grabs the official vector logos, sets everything in our exact typography, and renders thumbnails and 10-page deliverable guides in 30 seconds. The full workflow: 1. Record messy raw screen 2. Run one command 3. It cuts bad takes, masters audio, blurs private data, builds the thumbnail, and deploys the lesson live to our course platform Turnaround went from 4 days to 8 minutes Cost went from hundreds per video to virtually zero Most people are still chatting with AI We plugged it into our files and turned how we work into codefrozen6d ago1.1K12100132.40%
An old software engineer friend, tired of his job, asked me how to make extra money with AI. I gave him the exact outreach method I used to land my clients. He quit over a TikTok. We spent an hour on a call going through every step, and I told him to send me his progress on WhatsApp so I could keep him accountable. He did it for 3 days, disappeared for 2, then sent me a 30-second TikTok saying that outreach method is saturated. The internet has been telling him AI will replace developers for years, and he still shows up to work every Monday. But one TikTok and suddenly a random guy knows more than someone who's actually done it. Funny how convincing people get when they're giving you permission to stop. He didn't quit because of the TikTok. He quit first, then went looking for a reason. Half trying protects your ego. 0 skin in the game, 0 vulnerability, and when it doesn't work you still get to believe you could have made it. Nothing ever gets a serious attempt, so your opinion of yourself never has to change. Psychologists call it self-handicapping. Going ALL IN takes away "I never really tried." If it fails, it's on you, which is exactly why most people never do it. The moments you don't see results are when you DOUBLE DOWN.frozen6d ago1.1K1601031.89%
Last few months I’ve been in rooms with people I used to only watch on screens Top streamers, UFC champs, politicians, the ones quietly running the media None of it feels intimidating anymore Meet enough people you thought were untouchable and the pedestal completely disappears They’re just guys who didn't quit Every single time, I walk away thinking the exact same thing: If they could do it, why the fuck can’t I?frozen1mo ago1.0K1502052.18%
https://t.co/NY2ZL9eT69frozen1mo ago934800021.07%
https://t.co/jn5rvKeMbvfrozen7d ago7831401001.92%
https://t.co/IhItwwx1Jffrozen9d ago782900001.15%